|
|
|
Editor
/ Publisher: Clifford
J. Vander Yacht 2363 Lourdes Drive West Jacksonville
FL 32210-3410 <CliffVDY@JUNO.COM>
|
Newsletter
Online: www.rlhs.org/rlhsnews/rlhsnews.htm
|
Editorial
Advisors Jim
Smith Bruce Heard John Gruber
R&LHS MEMBER SERVICES
|
|
Membership
Matters
Membership applications, change of address, and other
membership status inquiries should be sent to:
R&LHS - Membership William H. Lugg, Jr.
PO Box 292927 Sacramento CA 95829-2927
Trading
Post
Society members may use, without
charge, the Trading Post section of the quarterly Newsletter
and the R&LHS Website to advertise items they
wish to sell, trade or acquire or to seek information
from other readers. This service is intended for personal,
not general commercial, use. All items should be sent
to Clifford J. Vander Yacht, see address above.
Commercial Advertising
Anyone may present, with payment,
display advertising to the quarterly Newsletter and
the R&LHS Website to advertise any railroad oriented
items. All advertisements should be sent to Clifford
J. Vander Yacht, see address above.
Locomotive
Rosters & Records of Builder’s Construction Numbers
The Society has locomotive rosters for many roads
and records of steam locomotive construction numbers
for most builders. Copies are available to members at
twenty five
|
|
cents
per page ($5.00 minimum) from R&LHS
Archives Services, see address below. A list
of available rosters may be obtained for $2.00.
Back Issues of Railroad History
Many issues of Railroad History
since No. 132 are available at $7.50 per copy. For information
on the availability of specific issues and volume discounts,
write R&LHS Archives Services, see address below.
Articles from the Bulletin
& Railroad History
Copies of back issues of these publications
of the Society are available to members at twenty cents
per page ($5.00 minimum) from R&LHS Archives Services,
see address below.
Research Inquiries
Source materials printed, manuscript,
and graphic are included in the Society’s Archives.
Inquiries concerning these materials should be addressed
to R&LHS Archives Services, see address below. To
help expedite our response, please indicate a daytime
telephone number where you can normally be reached.
Membership Lists & Documents
Membership
lists and copies of R&LHS official documents are
available from R&LHS Archives Services, see address
below. R&LHS Archives
Services, PO Box 600544, Jacksonville, Florida 32260-0544
|
|
© 2004 by The Railway
& Locomotive Historical Society, Inc. Printed
by Raintree Graphics of Jacksonville, Florida
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 2
|
|
COVER:
D&RG #1526, a M-67, has just uncoupled from the
caboose (shown to the left on the original print), so
it was probably providing helper service to the eastbound
freight at Moffat Tunnel in 1947. Don Ball, Jr. photo,
RGM&HS collection. 
Printing
Delay for Railroad
History No.
190 A
problem has arisen with the four-color press at our
print shop. A portion of No. 190 (Spring-Summer 2004)
was completed when the rolls malfunctioned, necessitating
a major delay as new controls are ordered and installed.
As of this writing (June 21), it appears that the issue
won’t be in the mail until the end of July. I
appreciate your understanding. A preview of No. 190
can be seen at:
www.rrhistorical-2.com/rlhs/ rrhistry/current.html
Mark Reutter, RRH Editor 

|
|
Comments
on Newsletter
It looks just like RRH should look!
And the subject matter — locomotives and railroad history.
A radical approach if ever I saw one. Looks and reads
just fine! — Vern Glover I enjoyed
Eugene Huddleston’s article on A. G. Trumbull and AMC
very much, most interesting, and with logically developed
conclusions. — Don Leach I received
… the excellent Newsletter
which I read nearly immediately cover to cover. — Alden
Dryer The new form of R&LHS
Newsletter
is great and am glad to see it. … I do think your latest
version is a great improvement over the old. More class
too. — Jim McFarlane I like to
new format for the Newsletter.
I hope a majority of other readers do too. The articles
selected for this issue were excellent too, although
I am probably prejudiced in this respect since the one
on "loops" was written by the late John Humiston,
a Chicago Chapter member. — Charles Stats Note:
Use CHARCOAL lighter fluid to help remove the tabs and
to wipe the glue off the paper. 
PM
#1225, at Bannister, Michigan, on May 31, 2003, shows
that the AMC design still runs very well. Many new parts
(piston rings, stay bolts, main driver springs, syphon,
etc.) keep it running. Photo by Adrienne Scholl. Courtesy
Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation (Project
1225).
|
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 3
|
|
Newsletter
Notes I had a Mac attack my Newsletter
files of the previous issue. Raintree Graphics’s PC
went down, so they transferred the Newsletter
to their Macintosh which doesn’t have fractions. On
page three, end of paragraph on notes is 7.25 inches,
page sixteen, Alaska is 1.5% grade, and page
seventeen, Morenci is for 1.5 miles. Also delete
the two extra lines at bottom of page seven. 
Photo "Contest"
Sort of
About 70 of us, plus a few regulars,
performed a reenactment of the Golden Spike Ceremony,
complete with a tolling of the bells amid silence in
tribute to President Reagan on June 11th. I personally
had a role of color guard. Adrian Ettlinger, who knows
Morse Code, tapped out "DOEN" (he got distracted
by his speaking role) at the proper moment. It was fun.
|
|
I now
present the following challenge. I will devote the center
eight pages of the next issue to photos taken by the
attendees with the best shot matching the famous photo
(see below for 1998 photo) as the 9x12 center fold.
With some luck ($310.57 more is needed for color printing
to be raised by advertising and/or donations) the full
eight pages can be in color. Send donations to me.
For those on the trips (yes, please
include all aspects of the convention) select your best
shots and send them to me. If you took slides or color
print film, send the slides or negative strips
(you may include a print so I can see which one you
want). All photos and negatives will be returned. If
you took digital photos, send, via e-mail or on a CD
or floppy, the file as it came from your camera. Try
to avoid JPG conversion and use compressed TIF if possible.
Add your captions for full effect. The prize? National
recognition. 
|
|

1998 R&LHS Convention. Courtesy of the Golden Spike
National Historic Site.
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 4
|
|
Counterbalancing
10-Coupled Power by
Don Leach
|
|
Powering
five driving axles in a single engine (called "ten-coupled"
for the number of drive wheels) offered a special challenge
to steam locomotive designers and shop men. Reciprocating
and rotating parts from pistons to drive wheels could
cause rough riding and damage to the track without proper
balancing. Previous broad generalizations of this subject
suggest an examination in detail would be helpful. Variables
affecting balance and overall roughness of ride include
reciprocating weight, driver diameter, construction
materials, connecting rod design, expected operating
speeds, etc. The analysis of fundamental mechanical
principles develops comparative "figures of merit"
for evaluation. That is my intent here.
DESIGN
To understand the improvements
made, one can first examine connecting rod design and
practice during the period just before WW I and through
the 1920s, the period when large 10-coupled power
first appeared and then attained widespread use. A very
common type of main rod design was the open back end,
assembled with large bolted blocks, brasses and retainers.
|
|
This
is commonly illustrated in period photos of USRA power,
and preceding and following power into the mid-1920s.
Its advantage was quick convenient replacement of main
rod crankpin brasses, the brasses subject to the greatest
wear, without removing the main rod from the crosshead,
considerably easing handling, and saving significant
shop time. Similar designs were common in the 19 th
century. This made perfect sense during the "drag"
era, with severely restricted speeds, an era which prevailed
until the advent of Super Power encouraged higher speeds
Its principal disadvantage was the
large mass applied at the worst possible location, from
a counterbalancing perspective, right at the main crankpin,
requiring great weight for counter-balancing rotating
weight, thereby reducing available weight to counter-balance
reciprocating weight and forces. This was most problematic
on 10-coupled power. The large mass also imposed high
dynamic loads on the crankpin at higher speeds.
During the late 1920s and into the
1930s, as operating speeds increased, these connecting
rods were replaced with more modern closed-end designs,
with varying
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 5
|
|
provisions
for brass replacement, by "shrink fit" or
in some cases requiring brasses cast in place, or employing
floating bushings, for the reasons just described. The
improvement in connecting rod construction brought a
significant improvement in counterbalancing, and reduction
in track maintenance. This rod replacement was often
done selectively according to engine assignments. For
example, Pennsy installed modern main rods on its N-2sa
USRA 2-10-2s, for general road service, but not on its
N-1s class assigned entirely to mineral service to and
from lake ports. Another main
rod design of interest, innovated by Lima with its Superpower
initiative, was the tandem rod, sometimes called the
articulated main rod by Lima. By employing a fixed bushing
in the main rod, which had a forked end surrounding
the rearward side rod, a portion of main rod forces
were transmitted directly to the rearward drivers, thus
reducing force on the main crankpin. This innovation
was likely motivated by the increased main crankpin
loads from Lima’s high horsepower engines, and resulting
wear and overheating of brasses. Conversely, this design
also increased weight at the main rod back end, aggravating
counterbalance problems. This feature offered advantages
at low speeds and with heavy loads, such as in climbing
the Berkshires on the B&A, but these advantages
would be overcome by the
|
|
weight
and counterbalance problems as speed increases.
Some very clear illustrations of
tandem rod use are provided in Locomotive Quarterly
vol. VIII no. 2, with the article "Texas Types
of the Burlington Route." These 2-10-4 engines
were built by Baldwin in 1927 and 1929, designated class
M-4 for coal service, and originally employed massive
tandem rods, though constructed of chrome-vanadium steel
(Railway Age 6/23/28), a major innovation. The
illustrations clearly show the changes to connecting
rods resulting from rebuilding to class M-4a, for improved
speed in general service. Reducing
cylinder diameter to 28" from 31" on the CB&Q
engines resulted in an 18.4% reduction in maximum connecting
rod compressive load, and a corresponding reduction
in cross-section. Further, installing conventional tapered
main rods with floating bushings and cross-counterbalanced
disc main drivers achieved further counterbalance and
speed improvements. This required an altered side rod
with knuckle pins intermediate to the 3 rd
and 4th
drivers. The limited cutoff feature was also removed,
to improve starting characteristics with the smaller
cylinders. It is interesting and logical that
Bessemer and Lake Erie, which acquired 47 near
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 6
|
|
duplicates
of the Burlington engines, made no changes to improve
speed, since its Texas types served entirely in coal
and iron ore service. These also had a higher 96,700
lbs tractive effort, since they did not have limited
cutoff. A dozen of these later served DM&IR.
It seems often to be assumed that
all 10-coupled power was similar, with similar limitations
and problems. This is not the case, as the characteristics
depend very much on individual specifications and, of
course, actual operating conditions. The Union Pacific,
for example, tended to emphasize speed in its tough
competitive battle with the Santa Fe and other Western
roads. It limited its driver axle loads to 59,500 lbs
until the mid-1930s, long after others had raised limits
sometimes to 70,000 lbs or more. It also specified the
relatively modest cylinder dimensions at 29" X
30" for its 2-10-2s, producing a similarly modest
70,500 lbs starting tractive effort. These specifications
allowed much lighter connecting rods and other reciprocating
parts compared to say the Erie R-1s and R-2s with their
31" X 32" cylinders, and nominal 83,000 lbs
TE. All of these engines had 63" drivers, which
were standard for medium sized (non-articulated) freight
power preceding the era of Super Power, where 69"
to 70" became standard. The results were
predictable, actually. Union Pacific’s engines often
attained 50 mph, (some sources say 60 mph,
|
|
Locomotive
Quarterly vol. XI no. 3, "Union Pacific Engines
in the Blue Mountains") and were regularly assigned
to mountain passenger service, while the Erie engines
were really suitable only for mineral or helper service,
and became noted as rail kinkers when assigned to merchandise
traffic, whenever they exceeded 30 mph (Baldwin Magazine,
April-July 1934). This made the Erie Berkshires of the
late 1920s (with 70" drivers) most welcome indeed!
This comparison illustrates that seemingly small changes
in specifications can produce major results. An
important improvement came with the 69"-70"
drivers as first employed by C&O T-1s of 1930. This
sizable increase in diameter on a 2-10-4 allowed
room for the required counterweights in the larger drivers,
and also reduced driver rpm, allowing 40-50 mph operation
for extremely large 10-coupled power with high tractive
effort and heavy connecting rods. In 1937, Santa Fe
employed 74" drivers on its 5001 class and other
innovations for improving power and speed!
MATERIALS
The improvements made possible with high-alloy connecting
rods are major, and often overlooked. In fact, it is
no exaggeration to say that this was the most important
single improvement in the counterbalancing of
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 7
|
|
10-coupled
steam power. This improvement in material is dramatically
illustrated in results reported for Chicago Great Western
2-10-4s by Railway Age, vol. 110 no. 14, 4/5/41.
These Texas types were built in 1930 by Lima and Baldwin
as essential duplicates of the Texas & Pacific engines
of 1925, which originated the type. When refitted with
chrome-vanadium steel connecting rods and rebalanced
drivers, calculated dynamic augment at 60 mph (that
is, pounding on the rails) was reduced from 34,200 lbs
to 2700 lbs, a figure even lower than the original value
of 3800 lbs at 20 mph (Table 3). Surprisingly, they
retained the tandem rod construction originally provided.
Some roads used chrome-nickel alloys instead. Southern
Pacific refitted fleets of engines with alloy rods,
extending even to light Harriman 2-8-2s, after discovering
that the lessened dynamic load reduced brass wear enough
to pay for the improvement. Allowed compressive stress
was increased by 25% over heat-treated carbon steel,
whereas tensile strength was increased considerably
more. All of the 10-coupled power noted for fast
running employed alloy rods, including Santa Fe 5000s,
Illinois Central rebuilt 2-10-2s, Canadian Pacific Selkirks
and of course the rebuilt Burlington and Chicago Great
Western engines. Selkirks were allowed 65 mph for regular
passenger assignments, while IC 2-10-2s attained 60
|
|
mph
on Iowa meat trains. Santa Fe 5000s attained 70-75 mph
in occasional passenger, express and troop train service.
An anecdote about WW II, and
its restrictions by the War Production Board on use
of alloy steels is of interest. Some may recall that
N&W was not permitted alloy steel connecting rods
for its wartime class J-1 4-8-4s, nor metal for streamlining.
They were built with heavy carbon steel rods and larger
counterbalancing weights on drivers. Many other roads
encountered similar restrictions. Santa Fe, however,
was allowed alloy steel rods for its 25 wartime 5011
class 2-10-4s. The reasons are really quite logical,
if one examines the details and circumstances. N&W
could achieve satisfactory speeds and operations with
its modern 8-coupled 4-8-4s, operating in "mountain"
territory not requiring high passenger train speeds.
The Santa Fe, however, would have been crippled in desert
operating speeds with carbon steel rods on 10-coupled
Texas types, over an artery vital to supplying the Pacific
war, so they were provided the required alloys. After
the war, N&W, acquiring alloy rods, rebuilt and
redesignated its wartime engines as class J, and applied
streamlining. The 5011 class was notably heavier than
the 1937 5001 class because of material restrictions
on components other than connecting rods, as were the
2900 class 4-8-4 compared to
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 8
|
|
prewar
engines, a situation typical throughout the country.
In some cases, including for the 5011 class, the added
weight improved adhesion and over the road performance.
In retrospect, it is somewhat puzzling
that application of alloy rods was not more focused
and selective. Since the major difficulty in weight
control is for the main driver, one would expect flanged
alloy main rods and center side rods, while slab carbon
steel rods would seem perfectly satisfactory for the
end main rods. Perhaps railroads wanted to avoid differing
handling and machining characteristics, or a possible
mix up on materials for replacement rods. Perhaps there
was concern over differing thermal expansion for dissimilar
material. Many roads did apply alloy main rods, while
retaining carbon steel side rods, a partial realization
of potential economies, while maximizing operating benefits.
ANALYSIS
Mechanical fundamentals and associated
mathematics affect an understanding of counterbalancing.
The appendix provides these fundamentals, with an explanation
in simplified form for comparison purposes only, not
for design. With these fundamentals, tractive effort
is the predominant parameter, for two models, not driver
diameter as is often supposed. Rod mass increases as
the square of driver diameter, due to increased span
length of connecting rods, compensated for by
|
|
reduced
rpm, with effects inversely proportional to the square
of driver diameter. Table 1 presents
numerical results of the inverse of Fc, required centripetal
force, providing a useful figure of merit for comparison.
Both models indicate results in reverse order of tractive
effort, with but two exceptions, the C&O T-1 and
Pennsy I-1sa. These exceptions will be discussed below.
The second model represented by equation (15A) is more
sensitive, with a high/low ratio of 1.81, compared to
1.44 for the first model per equation (15). This agreement
inspires some confidence in the approach. Engines with
alloy rods are ranked separately, since the two categories
are not directly comparable. Table
2 addresses a fundamental neglected by Table 1, that
larger drivers provide more space for counterbalance
weight. For present purposes, this space is considered
proportional to area, hence D squared. In fact, a cubic
relationship is possible, since location of counterbalance
weight at larger diameters has more beneficial effect
than weight closer to the center. The analysis of this
is complex, and is a focus of future work. Realistically,
a difference in rank of 1 should be considered insignificant,
but 2 would be significant. Column
(i) presenting a ratio of the two models’ results, shows
some groupings of engines with exceptionally high and
exceptionally low TE.
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
23-3 Page 9
|
|
There
are some notable anomalies between tabulated results,
and known performance in operation. In particular, the
Pennsy I-1sa 2-10-0 shows a last place ranking in Table
2, but was allowed 50 mph in service, though generally
assigned to mineral trains, or as pushers on heavy grades.
Pennsy’s early adoption of 130 lb rail is likely a significant
factor in the 50 mph speed allowance. The I-1sa design
was actually quite sophisticated, with hollow-bored
crankpins with grease reservoirs, heat-treated carbon
steel flanged rods, and other features quite advanced
for 1916. In fact, Pennsy data shows that the J-1 2-10-4s,
nearly identical to the C&O T-1, had 37% more dynamic
augment at 50 mph compared to the I-1sa (Pennsy Q
Class, Classic Power 5, Exhibit 3), in spite of
70" drivers compared to 62" for the 2-10-0s.
Hats off to Axel Vogt, for a great drag engine design,
though they were known to be rough riding for the crew.
This shows that great design can transcend ordinary
limits. The USRA heavy 2-10-2
of 1918-1919 shows quite a good ranking, yet the Pennsy,
with a fleet of 130, allowed only 35 mph for this design,
while Burlington, Colorado & Southern and Erie allowed
45 mph. The latter figure, however, was after the massive
open-end main rods were replaced with modern designs.
Later, after WW II, Burlington and C&S installed
chrome-vanadium main rods, achieving
|
|
improved
counterbalance and reduced track maintenance. These
speeds are comparable to very similar designs for Santa
Fe, Southern Pacific and others. Experience
on the Seaboard with light 2-10-0s is also worthy of
note, from a group of 23 Russian Decapods and 28 others
of improved design, both shown in the Tables. Both were
widely used on other roads, including the Gainesville
Midland, where light rail or swampy conditions precluded
heavier power or higher axle loads. Generally operated
in slow service, they proved surprisingly agile when
pressed, achieving 45-50 mph on occasion. (Locomotive
Quarterly vol. XXII, no. 4, "The Seaboard Air
Line’s Decapods"). An explanation would be that
exceptionally light reciprocating parts, allowed by
small TE, compensated for small drivers of 52"
and 56". The lone 8-coupled
engine in the tabulation, the D&RG M-67, ranks first
in Table 2, but with only trivial differences compared
to the Union Pacific TTT (UP talk for Two Ten Two) or
Seaboard Decapod. This confirms that tractive effort
is the dominant consideration, not the number of coupled
drivers. It might actually be argued that the Union
Pacific TTT could achieve better counterbalance because
it has five pairs of 63" drivers in which to locate
counterweights, rather than four. Another trick to improve
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 10
|
|
counterbalance on engines
with 2-wheel engine trucks, is a lengthened piston rod,
and correspondingly shortened main rod and relocated
crosshead, as exemplified by Santa Fe 5000s and L&N
2-8-4s. There is an interesting discussion of engine
balancing in the current Prospector,
vol. 2 no. 4, published by The Rio Grande Modeling and
Historical Society, in "3-Cylinder Locomotives
and the Denver and Rio Grande Western’s M-75s"
by Robert B. Schaefer. It cites the landmark industry
source, The Balancing of Engines, (D.E. Dalby,
1929), a major treatise on dynamic
|
|
balancing. This article
confirms the counterbalancing misjudgments of Baldwin
during that early Super Power era, and its lag in adopting
disc drivers and cross counterbalancing. Alco took the
lead in this respect. Those roads buying Baldwin power
which avoided these problems — including Santa Fe, Southern
Pacific, Northern Pacific, Burlington, etc. — enforced
their own methods and calculations. Hopefully, the
clarification provided by this investigation and survey
will invoke further thought and insights from others.
Thanks for your patience.
|
|
Notes
for Table 1 and 2 (pages 12-13)
(a) 1000 times Reciprocal Fc from
Eq. (15A) 1000 used for convenient magnitude (b)
100 times Reciprocal Fc from Eq. (15) 100 used for convenient
magnitude (c) Original specifications
at 190 psig. Erie, Burlington, others upped to 200 psig
(d) Heavy 63" drivered 4-8-2
included for comparison to UP TTT . (e)
Below this line, engines have Alloy Rods, usually chrome-vanadium
(f) Varies with boiler pressure,
typical 240 psig selected (g)
D 2
factor recognizes space in driver for counterweights,
" area and " D2
(h)
Similar to (g), except using model of Eq. (15A)
(i) Represents ratio of model Equation
(15) results to model Equation (15A) (j)
Where Models agree, that rank was selected. Otherwise,
ranking based on sum of two models. Selkirk tied with
M-4a, ranked 2 from operating history. IC 2-10-2 and
CGW 2-10-4 judged a tie from operating history.
(k) Carbon Steel and Alloy Rod Engines ranked separately,
not directly comparable.
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 11
|
|

|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 12
|
|
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 13
|
|

|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 14
|
|
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 15
|
 ABOVE:
Note the change from as built M-4 (massive tandem rods
shown above) to M-4a as rebuilt (much lighter conventional
rods with knuckle pins, and tapered main rod with floating
bushings shown below). Photo from Locomotive Quarterly
Winter 1984, Vol. VIII. No. 2. by Robert J. Foster.
BELOW: Photo by Charles T. Felstead.

BELOW LEFT: USRA 2-10-2B with massive
open-end main rod, as originally built, from Kalmbach’s
Trains Album of Photographs, no. 17, "Locomotives
of the Pennsylvania Railroad." BELOW
RIGHT: Lima A-1 tandem rod photo from Super Power
Steam Locomotives by Richard J.

|
|
Table
3* Comparative
Calculated Dynamic Augment in Pounds at Speeds Chicago
Great Western 2-10-4
|
Speed
|
Old Rods
|
New Rods
|
|
m. p. h.
|
and Wheels
|
and Wheels
|
|
5
|
238
|
19
|
|
10
|
950
|
75
|
|
15
|
2,140
|
169
|
|
20
|
3,800
|
300
|
|
25
|
5,935
|
469
|
|
30
|
8,550
|
675
|
|
35
|
11,630
|
918
|
|
40
|
15,200
|
1,200
|
|
45
|
19,230
|
1,520
|
|
50
|
23,770
|
1,875
|
|
55
|
28,800
|
2,265
|
|
60
|
34,200
|
2,700
|
* From Railway
Age, April 5, 1941, C.G.W. Freight Power Improved
Don Leach is a retired mechanical/process engineer who
worked 11 years for Gulf Oil, 4 years for Bechtel, 4
years for MW Kellogg, and others. Mostly process plant
design, equipment selection, contractor/vendor liaison,
general calculations and specifications, rotating equipment,
heat exchange, reactors, fractionation columns, etc.

Cook.
Despite the ponderous size of the main pin connections,
the forked main rod did transfer thrust to fourth driver.
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 16
|
|
B&M
Perspective, The Station & The Dog Wagon
By Alden
H. Dreyer
|
|
It
has been nearly 40 years since the Boston and Maine
Railroad disappeared (4/30/64) and over 20 years since
Guilford Transportation Industries, Inc. purchased the
Boston and Maine Corporation, Inc. (6/30/83). Things
have changed since we had a "Railroad with no ampersand
please," but lets think a bit of what has not.
You can still board the cars in Washington
and Philadelphia and New York City for Brattleboro,
Bellows Falls and W R Jct and beyond. And likewise boarding
in North Station will get you to Exeter, Dover and Wells.
Folks in fancy dress still ride each morning from Fitchburg,
Lowell and Rockport and the freights still whistle along
the Stony Brook and through the valleys of the Millers,
Deerfield and Hoosick Rivers. Men
who worked under Alan Dustin still switch the cars at
East Deerfield and answer the telephones and change
out the rails and chase the trespassers. Not to say
there hasn’t been natural attrition and new hires, but
at least in Western Massachusetts, it’s pretty much
the same old crew. But all that will change in the next
five years or so. Perhaps the most constant item
is a gentleman by the name of S. B.
|
|
Culliford,
who is listed in GRS ETT No.3 as Vice-President Transportation.
When Whit Haynes retired as General Manager circa 1968,
SBC took over that position and 35 years later, in his
70s now, he still holds that function. A rather amazing
record considering the turmoil of the past half century.

Sidney B. Culliford
as a signal draftsman in January, 1953, just prior to
entering military service. Photo from Boston &
Maine Railroad Magazine, March, 1953.
Turning now to what has changed that you probably
know nothing about: D. A. Biskerski retired recently
as a GRS Train Operation Manager and was well known
to everyone in operations and anyone who used a scanner.
I trained David to become a DS in the early 1970s in
Greenfield
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 17
|
|
and
was always proud of this particular student. What is
noteworthy from a historical standpoint is that DAB
was the last TOM to have worked in a former B&M
office as a DS that was not in North Billerica. There
is a lot to be said for the training you receive by
personal contact with the employees that dispatchers
were subjected to in Dover, Concord, Boston, Gardner
and Greenfield but was, and is, noticeably lacking in
North Billerica. The Station, at the foot of
Miles Street in Greenfield, Massachusetts, is simply
the world’s finest train viewing pavilion. It is accessible
for the mobility handicapped, well lit and fenced and
in the middle of a lovely park with normally adequate
parking on premises. The site is that of the former
T&G, FRR then B&M RR Station and is really in
downtown Greenfield.
|
|
There
is a caboose museum to explore, lots to read and study
and a wooden train for children of all ages to play
on. Adjacent is the former B&M Fitchburg Division
administration building that was opened on 01 March
1914 and locked for the very first time ever by this
writer at 1930 hours on Thursday, 13 April 1972, after
personnel and equipment had been disbursed. The building
has not changed much since then and visitors are welcome
to walk through during normal weekday business hours.
The Station was built with private funds and volunteer
labor and, of course, serves many functions besides
train viewing. The only negative here is the lack of
trains during daylight hours when the park is open.
The park is located in the wedge between the former
Connecticut River Division
|
|
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 18
|
|
and
Fitchburg Division main lines. The Conn. River is all
but dormant with no more than a train a day. The
Fitchburg Division route will see 7-10 movements on
a normal day. But since the railroad from Greenfield
to Rotterdam Jct. is a single track mountain railroad,
trackwork takes priority during daylight hours especially
on weekdays during the warmer months. So you may see
5 trains at The Station, or none on any particular day.
|
|
Now if you visit The Station
on a weekday, try to arrive hungry around the midday
hours and look up Jim Breton at his Dawg Wagon on Main
Street near the intersection with Routes 5&10. Jim
is a personable young man who worked many years as a
B&M trainman, then engineman, and then as a ConRail
and CSX engineman. Why would a talented young man give
up running thruough the beautiful Berkshire Hills, with
an exciting, lucrative and secure career, and take up
operating a hotdog cart in the dying industrial city
of Greenfield? Catch Jim when he’s not too busy and
he may give you a hint. Tell him Alden Dreyer sent you.
And talk to Jim before you give up that day desk job
for the glory of running through those Hills on CSX
or GRS.
|
|

|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 19
|
|
TRADING POST
Submissions should be made to the Newsletter editor
via e-mail or mail for inclusion in the next issue.
All items subject to available space and editorial decisions
as to content. New Trading Post items are posted on
our WebSite. <http://www.RLHS.ORG > FOR
SALE - PC Fonts for stationery to prototype lettering.
$10.00 each, add $3.00 s/h.

Clifford Vander Yacht, 2363 Lourdes Dr. W.,
Jacksonville FL 32210-3410. WANTED
- Steam, Diesel, and Electric Builder’s and Number Plates.
I have been collecting for 41 years, and I am still
looking to fill voids and purchase traders. I am looking
for a Rutland number plate with name cast in, PRR E-6
and T-l original keystones, any early Pre-Alco number
plates, early first generation diesel plates, a round
Lima Shay plate, and many others. Ron Muldowney,
52 Dunkard Church Road, Stockton NJ 08559-1405, (609)
397-0293 <steamfan@crusoe.net> FOR
SALE - Dealer selling remaining inventory of Milepost
1: books, videos, pamphlets. Send LSSAE ($.60 postage)
for list. All items subject to prior sale. Sale ends
12/31/2004. Derail Books, P.O. Box 10087, Eugene OR
97440-2087. No phone calls please. FOR SALE -
Dealer selling personal collection of RR magazines and
Poor’s Manuals. Many issues of R&LHS Bulletins,
Railroad
|
|
Historys.
Send LSSAE ($.60 postage) for list. Buyer pays shipping.
David L. Dorrance, P.O. Box 10087, Eugene OR
97440-2087.

STILL available - The Chicago Chapter’s
reprint of Rock Island’s General Roster No. 66, of
Sept. 1, 1925, containing everything you would want
to know about the company, its officers, agents, stations,
structures, mileage, connections, clearances, and equipment,
etc. at the time of its greatest prosperity. Everything
except actual train schedules. 297 pages. Softcover.
$20 plus $2 shipping. Order from: D. T. Davis
Treasurer, Chicago Chapter, 2945 Everett St., Blue Island
IL 60406. FOR SALE - Railroad
books (Fiction & Nonfiction), Videos, Western
Railroader (loose and Bound), other magazines. For
list, send your name and address to David Graeber,
7840 Antelope Rd. Apt. 112, Citrus Heights CA 95610.
<ddgraeber@cs.com> WANTED - Photos of
the St. Louis and O’Fallon Railway, freight equipment,
passenger cars, caboose, hoppers,. Larry Thomas,
PO Box 1688, St. Louis MO 63188. (314) 535-3101. 
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 20
|
|
New RR Books
Press releases for new railroad oriented books appear
here. They are not paid advertisements and carry no
endorsement by the R&LHS. All items subject to available
space and editorial decisions as to content.
Locomotives
of the Upper Midwest Photo Archive: Diesel Power
in the 1960s & 1970s by Marvin Nielsen
with a personal look at makes and models of diesels
used by the Soo Line, Chicago & North Western, Burlington
Northern, Milwaukee Road, Wisconsin Central, Green Bay
& Western and others. Softbound, 128 pgs., 10¼x8½,
122 B&W photos. $29.95 +$4.95 s/h. Iconografix Dept.
PR, PO Box 446, Hudson WI 54106. (800) 289-3504.
Classic
Streamliners Photo Archive: The Trains and the
Designers by John Kelly features streamliners designed
by Raymond Loewy for the Pennsylvania Railroad, Henry
Dreyfuss for the New York Central, Otto Kuhler for the
Milwaukee Road and B&O, and the Electro Motive Division
styling team. Softbound, 128 pgs., 10¼x8½, 122 B&W
photos & ills. $29.95 +$4.95 s/h. Iconografix Dept.
PR, PO Box 446, Hudson WI 54106. (800) 289-3504.
Lawrence A. Brough and James H. Graebner brings you
From Small Town to Downtown: A History of
the Jewett Car Company, 1893-1919. Started in Jewett,
Ohio, and moved to Akron, the firm was never large,
but gained an excellent reputation for its elegant,
well-built wooden interurban cars. An extensive appendix
is given on the Jewett production. Hardbound, 270 pages,
7x10, 101 photos, bibl., 2 indexes. $49.95.
|
|
Hardbound, 270 pages,
7x10, 101 photos, bibl., 2 indexes. $49.95. Indiana
University Press, 601 N Morton Street, Bloomington IN
47404-3797. (812) 855-8817.
150
years ago, the Rock Island reached the Mississippi River
and celebrated. Grand Excursion on the Upper Mississippi
River: Places, Landscapes, and Regional Identity
After 1854 is edited by Curtis C. Roseman and Elizabeth
M. Roseman. Whole sections explore the building of the
railroad; give eastern newspaper accounts of the excursion;
plus details of steamboating, the pictorial landscape,
passenger trains along the scenic river, features of
the river towns, river navigation, development of preserves
and parks, the lumber industry and commercial fishing.
Softbound, 272 pages, 6x9¼, $19.95. University of Iowa
Press, 100 Kuhl House, Iowa City IA 52242.

Rods Down and Dropped Fires: Illinois Central
and the Steam Age — In Perspective by Richard P.
Bessette, is a new volume on the Illinois Central. With
over 1,000 b&w photographs, this work presents an
extensive view of the Railroad’s steam locomotive photography
archive in one definitive source. Hardcover, 608 pages,
8½ x 11, $59.95, $6 s/h ($5.10 tax for IL res.). RTN
Press LLC, PO Box 2333, Orland Park, IL, 60462.
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 21
|
|
Mystery
Photos
Here are some nice photos of engines
and maybe an excursion. Can you identify any of these?
With the photos run so far we have had fair results.
The two aerial views of a yard published in the last
Newsletter received no additional information.
These here have been presented to the R&LHS Internet
Forum (or RLHSGroup) without being identified. The rest
of those 20 photos have a range of information from
very basic to rather complete captions, thanks mainly
to Thomas T. Taber, III, Herb Harwood and John Gruber.
MY019
Tauton?

MY021
M&STL #130

|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 22
|
|

MY006 Hayes collection,
#51, Boxcar: MVRR 3841
Send information to Clifford J. Vander Yacht,
R&LHS Newsletter Editor, 2363 Lourdes Drive West,
Jacksonville FL 32210-3410 or via e-mail to CliffVDY@Juno.com.

MY002
#331
|
|
R&LHS Newsletter
|
|
24-3 Page 23
|
|
© 2004 by The Railway
& Locomotive Historical Society, Inc.
|